Should Shaq have been the NBA MVP form 2000 to 2004?

YearLgW-LPlayoffs

2006-07NBA42-40Lost West Conf 1st Rd

2005-06NBA45-37Lost West Conf 1st Rd

2004-05NBA34-48missed

SHAQ TRADED

2003-04NBA56-26Lost NBA Finals

2002-03NBA50-32Lost West Conf Semis

2001-02NBA58-24Won NBA Finals

2000-01NBA56-26Won NBA Finals

1999-00NBA67-15Won NBA Finals

Should Shaq have been the NBA MVP form 2000 to 2004?nba draft picks

Shaq should have definitely won more than one MVP award. He probably should have won it in 2001 as well. He absolutely deserved it. But not for a four or five year stretch, hardly anyone in history has ever merited consideration for half a decade straight.

Should Shaq have been the NBA MVP form 2000 to 2004?nba playoffs ,nba teams

just because the lakers are garbage now. doesn't mean that he should get league MVP. it just means he should have gotten a huge contract and the L.A. Lakers MVP. Report It


I don't think so, but he could've.

Cause he lost the Finals several times but won some

championships before, so I really don't know
no bill walton your a retard
MVP is for the regular season. Votes for MVP are due to the NBA on the last day of the season. You're mixing apples and oranges between regular season results and playoff results.

BTW, you could make an argument for Shaq winning more regular season MVPs but the argument you present here falls short.
^^ weird hearing that from a guy who murdered his family...
Sorry but No.

He definitely deserved it in 2000 and he got it. But here is my take on the other years...

2001 - This was tough between Duncan and Shaq but I would've given the edge to Duncan. Iverson eventually got it and I don't think he deserved it. He is a warrior an all but he got his team to the 6th seed in the East while scoring alittle over 31 ppg! But Duncan and/or Shaq was more deserving imo. Duncan had his best FT% EVER at nearly 80%! He had his best ppg and rpg thus far as well all while carrying his team to the 2nd best record (tied w/LAL) that season.

2002 - KG deserved it, Duncan got it and Shaq would've been a third option in my opinion. KG took his team to the 4th seed of a very talented Western conference with Wally S. and Troy Hudson! It doesn't matter about losing in the 1st round b/c the MVP is about regular season impact.

2003 - also belonged to KG but Duncan got it. Brand had a monstrous year and I would've chosen any of those 3... before Shaq. KG, Cassell, Sprewell, and Wally took the T'Wolves to their best season ever. 1st in the West and KG was a BEAST that season!

2004 - KG deserved it and KG finally got it.

Now it may seem as if I'm a KG fan but I actually am not. I just call it as I saw it and he was very dominate those years. Haven't been the same since but we'll see what happens in Boston....
shaq won it in 2000, but he wasnt the league's most valuable player from then on. tim duncan was just better in 02 and 03. double double machine and got more assists than shaq. AI won it in 2001 because he was just the mvp, fought hard every game, leading the league in scoring and steals. he even lead his team to victory in game 1 against the heavily favored lakers, scoring 48. 2004, Garnett was just dominant, shaq wasnt even in the talks. shaq got one mvp, that's enough for him. i understand he's dominant, but other ppl were better.